Post by Admin on Jun 20, 2024 10:19:34 GMT
GOD shows mankind what Infinity means during Creation of Adam and Eve
During the creation of Eve, GOD describes Infinity to Adam and what this means to humans. Now let’s consider the creation of Adam as the Universal set of all humans who have ever lived and will ever live, as designed and created by GOD, the Grand Universal Set of all things, who is also grand infinity. We shall term this Set about mankind as {A}.
In the Scriptures the term 'Ab' refers to the Provider, the notion of a 'father' is a more specific meaning, as a 'father' is also a 'provider', and 'fruit trees' are also 'providers', but 'fruit trees' cannot become 'fathers'. Likewise the 'Ahabah love' refers to 'Responding love'. GOD makes the gender male called Adam first and he walks in Eden containing within him {A} : all the elements of all the humans who would ever exist . Not only does {A} contain the ability to make further 'seed' , but the {A} also contains billions and billions of sacred letters describing the process of living in letter biological code, contained within the fragile DNA molecule.
But Adam feels lonely because he has only 'Ahab love', and is a 'provider' without any corresponding 'responding' to his 'provider love', made Adam feel lonely. He notices all the other animals have personalities of love and loving, but not for him. God wanted to teach Adam a very important lesson about the set within him {A}. Which according to Romans 1:20 is a type explaining the nature of the Grand Universal Set called Infinity Elohiym.
Can you make more copies of all the elements in {A} but still retain one living Being? Yes you can. Inside Adam the {A} is written on DNA strands, and there are two strands of DNA holding the letters of holy living, some read forwards and the other strand reads backwards, so there are two copies of the letters of living, and on top of this there are two copies of the DNA chromosomes, making 4 copies of the letters of living within Adam.
So {A} = {a1 + a1} union { a2 + a2}
Now my maths ability in describing sets is letting me down, but the {A} set contains two copies of {a} and each copy of {a} is verifiable by its counter copy strand. This allows the sacred letters of living ( ie:'A' 'T' or 'G' 'C' ) to be preserved.
You are allowed in set theory to write more than one copy of it’s elements, but you still have only {A} even though you have inside {A} the same letters written four times.
Question: Does this mean we have four more times the sacred letters of living? No we have only one Being living even though he has two copies and two forward copies and two backward copies, the information contained is just the same within {A}.
So the four times the numbers of all letters is still the same {A}, and we have one set.
Originally the {A} is written across 24 chapters, which we term chromosomes, and thus these original 24 chapters hold the collection of {A} within the "Book of Life". When Adam sinned it is assumed chromosome 2 became stuck early on, making two centromeres and one very large chapter of letters. Thus today we see 23 chapters of the letters within {A} , the "Book of Life", instead of the original 24 chapters.
One of these chapters is interesting and termed the sex chapter because it looks like a X and Y , under a microscope, if you are a provider (gender male) showing provider loving, your sex chapters would look like a “x” and a “y”.
When GOD put the man into a deep sleep, he built a help-mate for him using the same sacred letters Adam already had {A}.
What happened is the sex chapter got some pages turned off, and some pages doubly turned on, the expressions of certain letters is made more abundant in this organism.
Now when GOD presented the help-mate to Adam, do we have two human beings in Eden?
This is why Adam called her a woman because she was built out of the {A} but her expression of loving is different to the man. And the Scripture says the two personalities of loving become cardinally one flesh. This is true because {A} is contained as the same sacred letters within both personalities of love. It’s just the {A} is expressed differently by each member of adam, the Hebrew word for humanity as a whole. Thus we have to consider the creation of the word 'adam' as a 'family' word. Later on the children who come are mere collective swapping of the {A} set making an extremely large number of combinations possible, (we might term Q), so that no future child is exactly the same expression as the one before. But all the children of 'collective love' retain the same {A} the mixing of 'provider' and 'responder' love causes differences in the manner of their personalities of love.
Ro 1:20 For the invisible things of him (GOD) from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
I do not see Adam and Steve created in Eden, or two couples of provider love, but this is what my fellow SDA colleagues have come up with? This verse says you can learn of the invisible things of the Godhead by the things Elohiym has made in His creation.
Why did GOD create Adam but built a woman in Eden? Not another Steve, but an Eve?
Most people consider “love” to be one theme, but the Scriptures speaks of two Hebrew words for love, not one as most people consider. This has profound impact on what love and loving means. What it means is provider love is only complete with responder love.
And why do my SDA colleagues undermine this simple verse in Genesis:
Ge 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: ..
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Hebrew is about function, not description, so what does gender male and gender female mean during this creation process. Mankind was made in the functional image of Elohiym.
The only thing that fits is 'Ahab love' and 'Ahabuh love', the personalities of loving is made and shown in Eden for a reason and the whole world has neglected to notice this importance.
The Jews typically consider three personalities of Elohiym as “three gods” making a pagan notion of polytheism. But they do not consider their own Hebrew torah. God declares the two as 'cardinally one flesh'. What does this mean? In Lev 18:8 In a true marriage the two personalities of loving are considered as one being of flesh. This is confirming the {A} set and the wholeness of all the letters for sacred living in them. Only when the Provider provides and the Responder responds does the Love flow as a single source. Thus we can think of Elohiym as Divine battery power, and no one member of Elohiym is truly independent of the other, hence you cannot describe them as separate beings.
This is the same idea of infinity as a set. While you are allowed to make a universal set with three copies of infinity inside, this does not make more than infinity. It only changes the way infinity is expressed.
To make this matter more clear, I was guided by GOD to speak for several years to a Gnostic Christian, who existed in Paul and Johns time, as the Alpha apostasy.
The Hypostasis of the Archons - The Nag Hammadi Library
"Within limitless realms dwells incorruptibility. Sophia, who is called Pistis, wanted to create something, alone without her consort; .
When I read this I was shocked. Here the Holy Spirit is leaving her consort to do some creating on her own. Not possible. False. No wonder Jews consider three gods as a pagan notion of polytheism.
The Author does not consider the family members of Elohiym as independent or separate sources of love, each are reliant upon the others for a single flow of love, thus is the Alpha Apostasy in Johns time known as Gnostism is the same Omega Apostasy for the latter time, in the last day.
One of the biggest elements of Gnostic thinking is the concept of faith, based on mental assent. It has become the biggest influence throughout the entire world, and sadly when Jesus comes He declares “will I find faith on the earth”?
Some in Gnostic thinking simply declare all we have to do, to be truly saved is to fully know the Lord Jesus in some advanced cognitive way.
Sadly the same notion exists within my SDA church, where “surrender” is considered the idea to fully know the Lord Jesus, and is the “highest” step to Christ in your “ladder of salvation”. So most of us yearn to develop this highest ideal that was never developed by Ellen White in her little book “Steps to Christ”. Instead we find the word “surrender” scattered throughout her book, not as some grand step we must do, but as the first step in coming to Jesus as a process, not a step at all. Some how we have missed out on understanding the salvation process of reaching Jesus via our faith in Him. Sadly most of us so called Christians do not have the true understanding of faith with our salvation in Jesus.
Like other knowledgeable humans, we SDA people have also invented traditions and precepts of men, where we feel comfortable in our feeble attempts to reach the Salvation of Jesus. Sadly even Gnostic thinking has engulfed the entire world religions with it’s style of thinking about salvation, where faith is considered as 'mental assent' only.
Like the theorem of Oscars Razor, the notion complex things can be reduced to oneness, we have One Divine Family. Where did the members of the Family come from? From the Grand Universal set of itself, we term infinity. Like in the case of mankind written in Hebrew as the word “adam” is a "family" word meaning, where all the humans that ever lived and will live come from. This also includes the human nature of Jesus who also took up this encoding of {A} .
Some might argue well, who created the {A} in the first place? If we say B did, than who created B, well C did. Than who created C? We will never reach the end of this notion of thinking, about what created what. It is a Q paradox. Let’s just say Infinity is self existing, and leave the Q thinking alone, and stay within humanity as a child (Ps 131).
But what about the Jewish idea that GOD cannot be three gods? Consider water, the molecule made from two masculine H atoms and one feminine O atom. I used to teach chemistry to students where the term masculine atoms are thought as providers of electrons and feminine atoms are thought as receivers or responders of electrons. Can you consider the H as a water molecule? No. So why does the Jew consider Elohiym as one, while Elohiym has two arms the left and right hand, do we have two arms of Creative power? Assuming that Elohiym power looks like us? We have to understand the Hebrew word echad means not just one but also compound unity, the idea that the parts of the whole function as one.
The Romans borrowed the Greek idea of Phalanx where the individual soldier fought in groups like a single machine, was much harder to fight off than the individuals themselves, as Scripture says a bundle of cords is stronger than a single strand. Ec 4:12.
In a simile way loving and being loved cannot be achieved on your own, and relational power of love is only explained where provider and responder love is made collective by children. Some say one can love all on their own, is weird, for self love does not exist in Hebrew thinking.
Mt 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Jeff Benner says the phrase love thyself does not exist in Hebrew, the word means “like” so what this verse is saying, love others as God loves you. God is the first example of love. And you cannot have an example unless GOD is also relational in love.
Notice Jesus describes two ways to love, not three. The first is to love GOD (how GOD demonstrates love) and the second is to LOVE others like how GOD loves you. Le 19:18.
Never once does Jesus say to love Self, and therefore self-love cannot exist in a sinless domain.
We shall leave this here, somethings are fully beyond comprehension, though is it fun to think on these things until our brain hurts, so it is best to go and do somethings more suited to our endeavor and abilities and leave the unknown beyond the horizon.
During the creation of Eve, GOD describes Infinity to Adam and what this means to humans. Now let’s consider the creation of Adam as the Universal set of all humans who have ever lived and will ever live, as designed and created by GOD, the Grand Universal Set of all things, who is also grand infinity. We shall term this Set about mankind as {A}.
Some people in Mathematics say, since the number of elements to be born within A cannot be counted, the number of people who have ever lived and will live becomes an infinite set. This is ridiculous, and although the number to be born is a very large number, (we might term Q), the number is finite, and the set {A} is also finite. Since GOD the grand universal set of all things, is also a personal Being expressing love, in the Bible there are three ways to express this love. Most English people consider only one word for love.
There is 'Ahab love', which reads in Ancient Hebrew as “the strong Being in the Home” and there is 'Ahabah love', which reads in Ancient Hebrew as “the strong Being in the Home relating to another Being” These two expressions of love relate to functional descriptors and relational concepts of love and being loved.
In the Scriptures the term 'Ab' refers to the Provider, the notion of a 'father' is a more specific meaning, as a 'father' is also a 'provider', and 'fruit trees' are also 'providers', but 'fruit trees' cannot become 'fathers'. Likewise the 'Ahabah love' refers to 'Responding love'. GOD makes the gender male called Adam first and he walks in Eden containing within him {A} : all the elements of all the humans who would ever exist . Not only does {A} contain the ability to make further 'seed' , but the {A} also contains billions and billions of sacred letters describing the process of living in letter biological code, contained within the fragile DNA molecule.Ro 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Now readers please pay attention to how GOD explains Infinity Elohiym to mankind.
So {A} = {a1 + a1} union { a2 + a2}
Now my maths ability in describing sets is letting me down, but the {A} set contains two copies of {a} and each copy of {a} is verifiable by its counter copy strand. This allows the sacred letters of living ( ie:'A' 'T' or 'G' 'C' ) to be preserved.
You are allowed in set theory to write more than one copy of it’s elements, but you still have only {A} even though you have inside {A} the same letters written four times.
Question: Does this mean we have four more times the sacred letters of living? No we have only one Being living even though he has two copies and two forward copies and two backward copies, the information contained is just the same within {A}.
So the four times the numbers of all letters is still the same {A}, and we have one set.
Originally the {A} is written across 24 chapters, which we term chromosomes, and thus these original 24 chapters hold the collection of {A} within the "Book of Life". When Adam sinned it is assumed chromosome 2 became stuck early on, making two centromeres and one very large chapter of letters. Thus today we see 23 chapters of the letters within {A} , the "Book of Life", instead of the original 24 chapters.
One of these chapters is interesting and termed the sex chapter because it looks like a X and Y , under a microscope, if you are a provider (gender male) showing provider loving, your sex chapters would look like a “x” and a “y”.
When GOD put the man into a deep sleep, he built a help-mate for him using the same sacred letters Adam already had {A}.
What happened is the sex chapter got some pages turned off, and some pages doubly turned on, the expressions of certain letters is made more abundant in this organism.
So the help-mate has 'Responder loving' and her {A} looked exactly the same as Adam’s set {A} except her sex chapter had the Y chapter switched off or changed in shape somehow; and a second copy shape appeared looking like another 'X' causing an over abundance of this expression. Under the microscope we see this chapter as “x” and “x”.
Now when GOD presented the help-mate to Adam, do we have two human beings in Eden?The answer is no. When GOD created each animal kind they had Provider love and Responder love within each kind, so this makes the animal kind a single set of sacred letters. Likewise in the human kind, there is no difference in the {A} within the gender male or the gender female, they are the same, but each person has differences in loving. GOD was showing the man that his provider love is not complete until responder love completes it. Thus love is not considered two ways of loving but one way to love, each sub-unit is required to complete love, because love is relational and involves communion with each functional sub-unit functioning as a whole.
This is why Adam called her a woman because she was built out of the {A} but her expression of loving is different to the man. And the Scripture says the two personalities of loving become cardinally one flesh. This is true because {A} is contained as the same sacred letters within both personalities of love. It’s just the {A} is expressed differently by each member of adam, the Hebrew word for humanity as a whole. Thus we have to consider the creation of the word 'adam' as a 'family' word. Later on the children who come are mere collective swapping of the {A} set making an extremely large number of combinations possible, (we might term Q), so that no future child is exactly the same expression as the one before. But all the children of 'collective love' retain the same {A} the mixing of 'provider' and 'responder' love causes differences in the manner of their personalities of love.
When GOD arose as three copies of infinity as a grand universal set, this does not make Infinity more than Infinity. It also does not make the Infinity set into three Beings of Infinity.
Consider GOD making TWO CLONES of Adam, does that mean Adam is now two persons, or one person? How boring would it be to have two 'providers' of love as a companion? Have readers ever considered this idea? And yet in ignorance the SDA church which is my church today, considers the Holy Spirit as masculine as the Father and the Son is masculine as a personality of love? So we have three eternal 'providers' of love? is this what GOD showed in Eden to Adam? No. Why than so we as SDA people violate the verse explaining to us the creation understanding of Infinity Power:-
Ro 1:20 For the invisible things of him (GOD) from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
I do not see Adam and Steve created in Eden, or two couples of provider love, but this is what my fellow SDA colleagues have come up with? This verse says you can learn of the invisible things of the Godhead by the things Elohiym has made in His creation.
Why did GOD create Adam but built a woman in Eden? Not another Steve, but an Eve?
Most people consider “love” to be one theme, but the Scriptures speaks of two Hebrew words for love, not one as most people consider. This has profound impact on what love and loving means. What it means is provider love is only complete with responder love.
And why do my SDA colleagues undermine this simple verse in Genesis:
Ge 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: ..
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Hebrew is about function, not description, so what does gender male and gender female mean during this creation process. Mankind was made in the functional image of Elohiym.
The only thing that fits is 'Ahab love' and 'Ahabuh love', the personalities of loving is made and shown in Eden for a reason and the whole world has neglected to notice this importance.
The Jews typically consider three personalities of Elohiym as “three gods” making a pagan notion of polytheism. But they do not consider their own Hebrew torah. God declares the two as 'cardinally one flesh'. What does this mean? In Lev 18:8 In a true marriage the two personalities of loving are considered as one being of flesh. This is confirming the {A} set and the wholeness of all the letters for sacred living in them. Only when the Provider provides and the Responder responds does the Love flow as a single source. Thus we can think of Elohiym as Divine battery power, and no one member of Elohiym is truly independent of the other, hence you cannot describe them as separate beings.
This is the same idea of infinity as a set. While you are allowed to make a universal set with three copies of infinity inside, this does not make more than infinity. It only changes the way infinity is expressed.
To make this matter more clear, I was guided by GOD to speak for several years to a Gnostic Christian, who existed in Paul and Johns time, as the Alpha apostasy.
The Hypostasis of the Archons - The Nag Hammadi Library
"Within limitless realms dwells incorruptibility. Sophia, who is called Pistis, wanted to create something, alone without her consort; .
When I read this I was shocked. Here the Holy Spirit is leaving her consort to do some creating on her own. Not possible. False. No wonder Jews consider three gods as a pagan notion of polytheism.
The Author does not consider the family members of Elohiym as independent or separate sources of love, each are reliant upon the others for a single flow of love, thus is the Alpha Apostasy in Johns time known as Gnostism is the same Omega Apostasy for the latter time, in the last day.
One of the biggest elements of Gnostic thinking is the concept of faith, based on mental assent. It has become the biggest influence throughout the entire world, and sadly when Jesus comes He declares “will I find faith on the earth”?
Some in Gnostic thinking simply declare all we have to do, to be truly saved is to fully know the Lord Jesus in some advanced cognitive way.
Sadly the same notion exists within my SDA church, where “surrender” is considered the idea to fully know the Lord Jesus, and is the “highest” step to Christ in your “ladder of salvation”. So most of us yearn to develop this highest ideal that was never developed by Ellen White in her little book “Steps to Christ”. Instead we find the word “surrender” scattered throughout her book, not as some grand step we must do, but as the first step in coming to Jesus as a process, not a step at all. Some how we have missed out on understanding the salvation process of reaching Jesus via our faith in Him. Sadly most of us so called Christians do not have the true understanding of faith with our salvation in Jesus.
Like other knowledgeable humans, we SDA people have also invented traditions and precepts of men, where we feel comfortable in our feeble attempts to reach the Salvation of Jesus. Sadly even Gnostic thinking has engulfed the entire world religions with it’s style of thinking about salvation, where faith is considered as 'mental assent' only.
Like the theorem of Oscars Razor, the notion complex things can be reduced to oneness, we have One Divine Family. Where did the members of the Family come from? From the Grand Universal set of itself, we term infinity. Like in the case of mankind written in Hebrew as the word “adam” is a "family" word meaning, where all the humans that ever lived and will live come from. This also includes the human nature of Jesus who also took up this encoding of {A} .
Some might argue well, who created the {A} in the first place? If we say B did, than who created B, well C did. Than who created C? We will never reach the end of this notion of thinking, about what created what. It is a Q paradox. Let’s just say Infinity is self existing, and leave the Q thinking alone, and stay within humanity as a child (Ps 131).
But what about the Jewish idea that GOD cannot be three gods? Consider water, the molecule made from two masculine H atoms and one feminine O atom. I used to teach chemistry to students where the term masculine atoms are thought as providers of electrons and feminine atoms are thought as receivers or responders of electrons. Can you consider the H as a water molecule? No. So why does the Jew consider Elohiym as one, while Elohiym has two arms the left and right hand, do we have two arms of Creative power? Assuming that Elohiym power looks like us? We have to understand the Hebrew word echad means not just one but also compound unity, the idea that the parts of the whole function as one.
The Romans borrowed the Greek idea of Phalanx where the individual soldier fought in groups like a single machine, was much harder to fight off than the individuals themselves, as Scripture says a bundle of cords is stronger than a single strand. Ec 4:12.
In a simile way loving and being loved cannot be achieved on your own, and relational power of love is only explained where provider and responder love is made collective by children. Some say one can love all on their own, is weird, for self love does not exist in Hebrew thinking.
Mt 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Jeff Benner says the phrase love thyself does not exist in Hebrew, the word means “like” so what this verse is saying, love others as God loves you. God is the first example of love. And you cannot have an example unless GOD is also relational in love.
Notice Jesus describes two ways to love, not three. The first is to love GOD (how GOD demonstrates love) and the second is to LOVE others like how GOD loves you. Le 19:18.
Never once does Jesus say to love Self, and therefore self-love cannot exist in a sinless domain.
We shall leave this here, somethings are fully beyond comprehension, though is it fun to think on these things until our brain hurts, so it is best to go and do somethings more suited to our endeavor and abilities and leave the unknown beyond the horizon.
In the latter rain, Elohiym is defined as a family term only once in the torah:-
Eph 3:10 ...might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God "Eloihym",
Eph 3:14 For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,
15 Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,
16 That he would grant you, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthened with might by his Spirit in the inner man;
15 Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,
16 That he would grant you, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthened with might by his Spirit in the inner man;
The Hebrew describes Elohiym as a family, not as a Catholic word 'trinity'. Such a term is a fuzzy word meaning unlike Hebrew word meanings chosen by God and recorded in Ancient Hebrew pictures for humans to discover, the word 'trinity' is defined over time by the traditions and precepts of men. Shalom
The light from the lampstand, consider the Father's light flowing over Mary. The Holy Ghost is the Holy Spirit, shown here as a "dove like power" that partially blocks the Father's glory (hence the term 'overshadow') and the yellow flow around Mary in the picture is process of heavenly parents doing the "born" process to their eternal Son YHWH-Elohiiym, adding humanity to him.